A male has denied regulating his mother as “bait” to feat teenagers.
Peter Griffiths, 65, and Avril Griffiths, 61, from Barry, repudiate a fibre of charges from a 1980s and 90s.
Complainants have formerly told Cardiff Crown Court they were “dressed up” by Mrs Griffiths in her clothes.
Caroline Rees, prosecuting, said: “This was a partnership in passionate exploitation, any of we with your possess partial to play.” Mr Griffiths said: “no”.
Their hearing has formerly listened a integrate were famous as “the Fred and Rose West” of their estate in a Vale of Glamorgan strand town.
On Thursday a justice listened Mr Griffiths report his attribute with his mother as “brilliant”, and pronounced she was his initial love.
He pronounced he met her when she was 13 or 14.
Jurors listened he found her “sexually attractive” when she was 14, and that she was profound during 15. She was taken into caring around that time.
Mr Griffiths pronounced he was a “totally opposite person” now, and denied being someone who always had an seductiveness in girls of a ages of 13, 14, or 15.
The 3 purported victims were children during a time of a abuse and Ms Rees pronounced they were all “vulnerable”.
She asked: “Is that your form Mr Griffiths, exposed and alone?” He denied this.
Mr Griffiths pronounced he would not report himself or Avril as a “sexually driven couple”, notwithstanding Ms Rees reminding him of their swinging, dogging, passionate photographs and “frolicking in foursomes” in homemade racy films.
Mr Griffiths replied: “It was one film”.
The justice has listened that one complainant purported she was raped by Mr Griffiths in a outpost he owned in a automobile park used for “dogging”.
Mr Griffiths pronounced that he and his mother “wanted to piquancy up” their sex life and denied carrying sex with one of a complainants with people watching.
Jurors formerly listened Mr Griffiths ran fishing trips. On Thursday he told a justice he was a usually one who rubbed fishing trips for military officers, and pronounced he was a “police officers’ contact”.
But he denied “pimping” girls out to his friends and he denied raping dual girls.
He told a justice that he had taken photos of one of them that could afterwards be sold, observant that “she asked me, we didn’t ask her”.
He denied bathing by charity ethanol and cigarettes, and pronounced that he had never had sex with her.
He pronounced of another lady “I never overwhelmed that child.”
Earlier in proceedings, a director of a jury was destined by a decider to find a defendants not guilty on count 11, an claim that they took faulty photographs of a child.
The justice listened there was now deficient justification to support a allegation.
Avril Griffiths has denied 5 charges of rape, dual charges of holding an faulty sketch of a child and dual charges of faulty assault.
Peter Griffiths faces 8 charges of rape, dual depends of holding an faulty sketch of a child and a serve 3 faulty attack charges.
The hearing continues.